學英語作文6篇(優)
在日常學習、工作和生活中，大家最不陌生的就是作文了吧，作文是從內部言語向外部言語的過渡，即從經過壓縮的簡要的、自己能明白的語言，向開展的、具有規范語法結構的、能為他人所理解的外部語言形式的轉化。如何寫一篇有思想、有文采的作文呢？下面是小編幫大家整理的學英語作文6篇，希望能夠幫助到大家。
學英語作文 篇1
今天，我把所有作業都做完了，閑著沒事干，便萌生出一個想法：教奶奶學英語。于是，我對奶奶說：“奶奶，我教您學英語吧？”“好！”奶奶爽快地答應了。我遞給奶奶一張預先準備好的“新生報名單”。上面寫著：“歡迎您加入花朵芬芳學校英語初級班，請填寫您的英文名字。”奶奶一看新生報名單就愣住了。“我哪有什么英文名字呀？”“沒關系，我幫您取。”我對奶奶說。
我想了一下，問奶奶“lavender,怎么樣？”
“好，好，好。”奶奶沒有經過思考就回答著。可當我問她“您叫什么英文名字呀？”她卻把剛才的lavender忘得九霄云外了。于是，教奶奶學英語就從教奶奶學讀英文名字開始了。
我不厭其煩地把lavender反復讀給奶奶聽。奶奶看著我的嘴型認真地學著。“la--ven--der”，可她的`發音很不標準。
“奶奶，您的嘴巴再扁一點，行嗎？”“?—?—?。”我把奶奶讀的不標準的地方，抽出來單獨訓練。我記得自己學小提琴的時候，老師一直叫我把掌握不好的地方抽出來單獨練，這樣效果很好。所以我也用這種方法教奶奶。還別說，經過我的耐心指導，奶奶終于學會讀自己的英文名字了。生怕下次再遺忘，奶奶拿來紙和筆，認真地記著筆記。
真認真啊！我在心里默默想著，奶奶年紀這么大了，學習起來還這么認真，真值得我學習呀。
奶奶學會了自己的英文名，我又教了奶奶一些水果類的單詞，每學一個單詞，奶奶都非常認真。
“奶奶，今天學的單詞，我下節課要抽背的哦。”在下課前，我對奶奶提出了要求。“好的，我會認真復習的。”奶奶說。
就這樣，一節有趣的英語課結束了。從中我不僅感受到了當老師的快樂，還體會到了生活的樂趣。
學英語作文 篇2
“Nuttertools”哇！出現武器了，想必大家都玩過《俠盜獵車》吧！那上面一串串怪異的單詞是啥？它就是作弊碼。一輸入相應的作弊碼，豪華賽車任你開，再輸入相應的作弊碼，暴力武器滾滾來，要多爽有多爽。但這些超常甚至變態的英語作弊碼，一定要準確無誤地背下來輸入才有效。
周五的微機室歡得不得了，同學們都熟練地忙著輸作弊碼，沒有人輸錯。可英語課上老師讓背幾個單詞，先提問：“某某某同學，‘正在畫畫’用英語怎么說？”那同學吱唔半天沒吭聲，又叫了一個同學還是站起來只瞪眼睛不會說，要知道他們可是作弊碼的快速記憶王。這我就納悶了：同樣是英語單詞，作弊碼有時長達十幾個字母，英語單詞只五六個字母，怎么能背下長的`背不下短的呢？真是天壤之別。我想了又想，終于想明白了。因為游戲比較有趣，而課堂太單調了，所以我決定設計一部游戲可以有作弊碼，但那作弊碼的內容就是英語課本內容，有一年級制、二年級制到六年級制不等，像玩游戲一樣學英語，英語像游戲一樣升級、通關。這樣會讓你的思維超快，記憶力超強，隨著年級的增高，這部游戲也會升級，升級后的作弊碼會越來越復雜，但同學們為了那玩游戲的超爽感覺，也會斗志昂揚努力學，有了興趣又怎么會學不好呢。有了我研究的作弊碼，別說小學，大學英語都沒問題，甚至和老外交流都是小菜一碟。
玩是孩子的天性，但玩也能造就人才，所以大人不要刻意扼殺孩子好玩的天性。同學們也應該把玩《俠盜獵車》的熱情放到英語上，那么英語會像母語一樣簡單。
Let’sgo,讓我們開始玩，《英語飛車》吧！
學英語作文 篇3
As modern technology surges,so does the number of people living in the virtual world .And I can imagine the result when more and more people prefer to live in the virtual world meets their needs rather than communicate with others in the real world.
With regard to this ,there are two different views.On the one hand,some people think that can enrich our life with its abundant resources.However,on the other hand,people hold the opposite opinion .They are worried that virtual world have too much badness information ,which exert a negative influence on themselves ,let alone children.What is more,it will do great harm to your ability of expression if you spend too much time wallowing it ,so much so that our relationships with others also will be destroyed.
Generally speaking,we need critical thought to distinguish with virtual world and real world .Meanwhile,we should cherish and enjoy our life and maintain good interpersonal relationships in the real world.
學英語作文 篇4
i am only a philosopher, and there is only one thing that a philosopher can be relied on to do. you know that the function of statistics has been ingeniously described as being the refutation of other statistics. well, a philosopher can always contradict other philosophers. in ancient times philosophers defined man as the rational animal; and philosophers since then have always found much more to say about the rational than about the animal part of the definition. but looked at candidly, reason bears about the same proportion to the rest of human nature that we in this hall bear to the rest of america, europe, asia, africa, and polynesia. reason is one of the very feeblest of natures forces, if you take it at any one spot and moment. it is only in the very long run that its effects become perceptible. reason assumes to settle things by weighing them against one another without prejudice, partiality, or ecitement; but what affairs in the concrete are settled by is and always will be just prejudices, partialities, cupidities, and ecitements. appealing to reason as we do, we are in a sort of a forlorn hope situation, like a small sand-bank in the midst of a hungry sea ready to wash it out of eistence. but sand-banks grow when the conditions favor; and weak as reason is, it has the unique advantage over its antagonists that its activity never lets up and that it presses always in one direction, while mens prejudices vary, their passions ebb and flow, and their ecitements are intermittent. our sand-bank, i absolutely believe, is bound to grow, -- bit by bit it will get dyked and breakwatered. but sitting as we do in this warm room, with music and lights and the flowing bowl and smiling faces, it is easy to get too sanguine about our task, and since i am called to speak, i feel as if it might not be out of place to say a word about the strength of our enemy.
our permanent enemy is the noted bellicosity of human nature. man, biologically considered, and whatever else he may be in the bargain, is simply the most formidable of all beasts of prey, and, indeed, the only one that preys systematically on its own species. we are once for all adapted to the military status. a millennium of peace would not breed the fighting disposition out of our bone and marrow, and a function so ingrained and vital will never consent to die without resistance, and will always find impassioned apologists and idealizers.
not only are men born to be soldiers, but non-combatants by trade and nature, historians in their studies, and clergymen in their pulpits, have been wars idealizers. they have talked of war as of gods court of justice. and, indeed, if we think how many things beside the frontiers of states the wars of history have decided, we must feel some respectful awe, in spite of all the horrors. our actual civilization, good and bad alike, has had past war for its determining condition. great-mindedness among the tribes of men has always meant the will to prevail, and all the more so if prevailing included slaughtering and being slaughtered. rome, paris, england, brandenburg, piedmont, -- soon, let us hope, japan, -- along with their arms have made their traits of character and habits of thought prevail among their conquered neighbors. the blessings we actually enjoy, such as they are, have grown up in the shadow of the wars of antiquity. the various ideals were backed by fighting wills, and where neither would give way, the god of battles had to be the arbiter. a shallow view, this, truly; for who can say what might have prevailed if man had ever been a reasoning and not a fighting animal? like dead men, dead causes tell no tales, and the ideals that went under in the past, along with all the tribes that represented them, find to-day no recorder, no eplainer, no defender.
but apart from theoretic defenders, and apart from every soldierly individual straining at the leash, and clamoring for opportunity, war has an omnipotent support in the form of our imagination. man lives by habits, indeed, but what he lives for is thrills and ecitements. the only relief from habits tediousness is periodical ecitement. from time immemorial wars have been, especially for non-combatants, the supremely thrilling ecitement. heavy and dragging at its end, at its outset every war means an eplosion of imaginative energy. the dams of routine burst, and boundless prospects open. the remotest spectators share the fascination. with that awful struggle now in progress on the confines of the world, there is not a man in this room, i suppose, who doesnt buy both an evening and a morning paper, and first of all pounce on the war column.
a deadly listlessness would come over most mens imagination of the future if they could seriously be brought to believe that never again in saecula saeculorum would a war trouble human history. in such a stagnant summer afternoon of a world, where would be the zest or interest ?
this is the constitution of human nature which we have to work against. the plain truth is that people want war. they want it anyhow; for itself; and apart from each and every possible consequence. it is the final bouquet of lifes fireworks. the born soldiers want it hot and actual. the non-combatants want it in the background, and always as an open possibility, to feed imagination on and keep ecitement going. its clerical and historical defenders fool themselves when they talk as they do about it. what moves them is not the blessings it has won for us, but a vague religious ealtation. war, they feel, is human nature at its uttermost. we are here to do our uttermost. it is a sacrament. society would rot, they think, without the mystical blood-payment.
we do ill, i fancy, to talk much of universal peace or of a general disarmament. we must go in for preventive medicine not for radical cure. we must cheat our foe, politically circumvent his action, not try to change his nature. in one respect war is like love, though in no other. both leave us intervals of rest; and in the intervals life goes on perfectly well without them, though the imagination still dallies with their possibility. equally insane when once aroused and under headway, whether they shall be aroused or not depends on accidental circumstances. how are old maids and old bachelors made? not by deliberate vows of celibacy, but by sliding on from year to year with no sufficient matrimonial provocation. so of the nations with their wars. let the general possibility of war be left open, in heavens name, for the imagination to dally with. let the soldiers dream of killing, as the old maids dream of marrying. but organize in every conceivable way the practical machinery for making each successive chance of war abortive. put peace-men in power; educate the editors and statesmen to responsibility; -- how beautifully did their trained responsibility in england make the venezuela incident abortive! seize every pretet, however small, for arbitration methods, and multiply the precedents; foster rival ecitements and invent new outlets for heroic energy; and from one generation to another, the chances are that irritations will grow less acute and states of strain less dangerous among the nations. armies and navies will continue, of course, and will fire the minds of populations with their potentialities of greatness. but their officers will find that somehow or other, with no deliberate intention on any ones part, each successive incident has managed to evaporate and to lead nowhere, and that the thought of what might have been remains their only consolation.
the last weak runnings of the war spirit will be punitive epeditions. a country that turns its arms only against uncivilized foes is, i think, wrongly taunted as degenerate. of course it has ceased to be heroic in the old grand style. but i verily believe that this is because it now sees something better. it has a conscience. it knows that between civilized countries a war is a crime against civilization. it will still perpetrate peccadillos, to be sure. but it is afraid, afraid in the good sense of the word, to engage in absolute crimes against civilization.
學英語作文 篇5
Hello, my friends! My name’s Sandy. Today, I will tell you an interesting story about rabbits. Look at me , now , I’m not Sandy but a mother rabbit. I have a happy family because of my three daughters.
They are very clever and lovely. In the morning , they have good habits . After they get up , And they have good habits. After they get up in the morning, they wash the face , brush the hair , clean the ears and blow the noses. They like singing and dancing , too . Now , let’s have a share , children , are you ready ? Yes, let’s go.Action , please!
學英語作文 篇6
說起我老爸，那真是文理貫通，古今貫通，唯有english一竅不通。為此，老爸特意拜我為師，決定好好“惡補”一下英語。
為了保證學習質量，老爸專門買了一根充氣狼牙棒。老爸說：“女兒啊，為了老爸能在最短的時間內學好英語，你一定要認認真真地教哦。若有絲毫怠慢，休怪我“棒下無情”！天啊，有這樣的學生嗎？
星期六，我正在看書，老爸突然跑過來問我“女兒，這個goaway（走開）什么意思？”我隨口答道：“走開。”老爸一聽訓斥道：“你這個孩子，怎么沒禮貌？快告訴我，這個單詞是什么意思？”“走開！”我又大聲地重復了一遍。“好！好！你竟然對我這么不尊重……”老爸一把搶走我的書，接著用狼牙棒“伺候”了我的頭部。“哼，難道我不會查詞典嗎？過了一會兒，老爸拿著詞典跑到我跟前說：“女兒啊，不好意思，老爸剛才誤會你了，不過你也有責任，你要說清楚點嘛，害得我們誤會一場。”我內心感嘆：真是啞巴吃黃連——有苦說不出啊！
一天，老爸又來向我請教：“女兒這個word（單詞）是啥意思啊？”“單詞。”我答道。“廢話，我當然知道它是英語單詞。我是問它的'漢語意思。”“它的漢語意思就是單詞嘛。”我不耐煩地回道。老爸又要拿狼牙棒，在這千鈞一發之際，我以最快的速度翻開英語單詞表，找到“word”的漢譯，大聲說：“且慢！您仔細審查一下。”老爸看完，不好意思地撓撓頭說：“女兒啊，真對不起，這次我又錯怪你了。”
好不容易等到老爸做飯去了，誰料廚房里又傳來了老爸的聲音：“女兒啊這個“sorry，idon’trnow”是什么意思？”我暈！我得快逃……
【學英語作文】相關文章：
學英語的作文04-14
學英語作文09-08
學英語作文【經典】02-19
學英語作文09-10
學英語作文（精選）10-01
學英語的作文01-15
學英語作文(精選)10-31
學英語作文（經典）02-05
學英語敘事作文11-19
爸爸學英語作文10-25